Polygon is too bitmap.

[1Minus2P1Stringer2]

Im using love.graphics.polygon, and its working, but the resulting polygon looks to pixelated to me, is there a way to make it have a higher quality to make it look more closer to an svg?

[mön]

Pixelated like aliased? You could enable multi-sampled antialiasing by adding a conf.lua to your project with following code:

Code: Select all

function love.conf(t)
    t.window.msaa = 4                   -- The number of samples to use with multi-sampled antialiasing (number)
end

https://love2d.org/wiki/Config_Files

[togFox]

img:setFilter("linear", "nearest")


??

[dusoft]

img:setFilter("linear", "nearest")


??

Probably that. Shouldn't this be a default option, anyway? I see many people having these issues on the forums. What does @slime think?

[togFox]

polygon and image are different beasts maybe so it might not be the filter but agree it should be the default option.

[slime]

What does @slime think?

As-is, people who use nearest talk about setFilter / setDefaultFilter. And people who use linear don't. So just listening to who's talking about it won't tell you how many people are using each mode.

Both have valid uses for different art / aesthetic styles. Personally I don't think changing the default has enough value to offset the fact that it would be an unwanted change for many people. But my opinion could be changed with a strong argument, I just haven't seen one so far.

Either way the choice has no effect on polygons and other shape APIs.

[1Minus2P1Stringer2]

What I mean by bitmap is like it looks like this. Love2d polygons have to have higher res capabilities right?

[pgimeno]

Have you tried what mön said? Filled polygons and circles are made of OpenGL triangles, which are usually rendered by default without antialiasing. setFilter won't help in this case though.

[1Minus2P1Stringer2]

Have you tried what mön said? Filled polygons and circles are made of OpenGL triangles, which are usually rendered by default without antialiasing. setFilter won't help in this case though.

Yes. I have. But, i mean, the Pixel res has to have higher capabilities right? Like with circles? Triangles look basically great but circles are a bit mid.

[zorg]

You said polygon before, not specifically circle;
love.graphics.circle has an extra segments parameter you can give a high enough number so it looks smoother; try that.