Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERUN]

General discussion about LÖVE, Lua, game development, puns, and unicorns.

After completing the test, what does the "You Support: ..." text say? (excluding FB sizes)

Nothing
7
10%
Framebuffers
2
3%
Framebuffers, Non-Po2 Framebuffers
0
No votes
Framebuffers, Non-Po2 Images
1
1%
Framebuffers, Non-Po2 Framebuffers, Non-Po2 Images
52
75%
Non-Po2 Images
7
10%
 
Total votes: 69

User avatar
Jasoco
Inner party member
Posts: 3725
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:35 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Contact:

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2

Post by Jasoco »

What's your computer specs? You can support pretty much anything. (I don't know what the maximum size is out there, but I put in the 8192 size just in case. Real world usage would probably rarely need more than 1024x1024 and maybe 1 or 2 of them.
User avatar
BlackBulletIV
Inner party member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:19 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia
Contact:

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by BlackBulletIV »

Sorry guys about the .love issue, and the bug that anjo kindly pointed out. I've updated this test to fix that bug, and run size tests. My computer comes out with everything! And sizes of 4096 x 4096 and 2187 x 2187! Not bad for 64 MB of shared memory.

If everyone could re-run the tests, that would be great.
User avatar
Lafolie
Inner party member
Posts: 809
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:59 pm
Location: SR388
Contact:

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by Lafolie »

Woohoo, looks like I support everything.
Image

Edit: Nice typo there! "framesbuffers" :D
Do you recognise when the world won't stop for you? Or when the days don't care what you've got to do? When the weight's too tough to lift up, what do you? Don't let them choose for you, that's on you.
User avatar
BlackBulletIV
Inner party member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:19 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia
Contact:

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by BlackBulletIV »

Awesome!

EDIT: Fixed the typo :).
User avatar
Lafolie
Inner party member
Posts: 809
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:59 pm
Location: SR388
Contact:

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by Lafolie »

You might wanna add a little message saying that the post-spacebar operations will take a few seconds too. I was bashing space because I had no idea what was going on.

Edit: Interesting. While I was having a paranoid moment and making sure there was no message already, I noticed that it worked it out much faster than the first run. Is this a systemy/processy cache thing? Or am I just overtired...
Last edited by Lafolie on Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Do you recognise when the world won't stop for you? Or when the days don't care what you've got to do? When the weight's too tough to lift up, what do you? Don't let them choose for you, that's on you.
User avatar
nevon
Commander of the Circuloids
Posts: 938
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:25 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by nevon »

Your test died once it started trying to create framebuffers, so I don't know if my computer supports non-Po2 framebuffers or not. Couldn't you put the tests in pcalls so that the test won't die if it fails?
User avatar
bartbes
Sex machine
Posts: 4946
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by bartbes »

Code: Select all

You support:
  Framebuffers
  Non-Po2 Framebuffers
  Non-Po2 Images
  Framebuffers up to the size 16384 x 16384
  Power of 3 Framebuffers up to the size 19683 x 19683
Power of 3?
User avatar
BlackBulletIV
Inner party member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:19 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia
Contact:

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by BlackBulletIV »

Lafolie wrote:You might wanna add a little message saying that the post-spacebar operations will take a few seconds too. I was bashing space because I had no idea what was going on.
I guess it takes a few seconds for you because your Po3 FB support is so good. It takes a few milliseconds for me. I'm putting up one now.
nevon wrote:Your test died once it started trying to create framebuffers, so I don't know if my computer supports non-Po2 framebuffers or not. Couldn't you put the tests in pcalls so that the test won't die if it fails?
I put them in pcalls. I don't what the problem is there. I think BarnD has completed the test without FB support.
bartbes wrote:

Code: Select all

You support:
  Framebuffers
  Non-Po2 Framebuffers
  Non-Po2 Images
  Framebuffers up to the size 16384 x 16384
  Power of 3 Framebuffers up to the size 19683 x 19683
Power of 3?
Next up from power of 2. I can't create tonnes of framebuffers by doing it in increments of 5 or something. Powers help to condition how many sizes we create.
User avatar
bartbes
Sex machine
Posts: 4946
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by bartbes »

BlackBulletIV wrote: I guess it takes a few seconds for you because your Po3 FB support is so good. It takes a few milliseconds for me. I'm putting up one now.
Yeah, same here, took pretty long. On the other hand, I gave up on jasoco's test after 30 seconds of completely freezing my computer, I had to do a hard reset.
User avatar
BlackBulletIV
Inner party member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:19 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia
Contact:

Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU

Post by BlackBulletIV »

It would take long considering your supported resolutions! I'll put one up that gives a message saying what it's doing.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 49 guests