Page 2 of 2

Re: .conf /.cfg?

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:07 am
by mike
tido wrote:ACTUALLY...

*.conf DOES use ONE WHOLE EXTRA BYTE of RESOURCES because of the extra letter (*.cfg has only three). So technically, it will take a few more CPU cycles to parse that string. :shock:

Also, I'm pretty sure it will use some more cycles looking the file up on the drive.
What year is this? :|

Re: .conf /.cfg?

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:23 pm
by tido
mike wrote:What year is this? :|
It still counts goddamnit!! :P