Poll: anti-SPAM techniques

General discussion about LÖVE, Lua, game development, puns, and unicorns.

Anty-SPAM measures

Poll ended at Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:27 am

Send new users a confirmation email with a link that they have to click before logging in
8
80%
Hide User profiles and groups for non-members
2
20%
 
Total votes: 10

User avatar
kikito
Inner party member
Posts: 3153
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:22 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Poll: anti-SPAM techniques

Post by kikito »

I've been reading this guide for preventing SPAM on phpbb (very interesting read)

It seems that LÖVE is now using Registration Auth Code (RAC). Is this new, or the spammers where able to go through it?

I've created a small poll for the community for the community to vote for 2 additional measures we could implement.

There are lots of other techniques on the post I mentioned above. Please leave a comment if you think any of them is worth discussing.
When I write def I mean function.
User avatar
bartbes
Sex machine
Posts: 4946
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Poll: anti-SPAM techniques

Post by bartbes »

Well, the thing is, since the server switch we used to miss a php lib, thus the quality of the captcha got worse, now the software is installed again rude should be able to get the captchas back to standards. Oh and I'm not sure about the links, but I found out yesterday user profiles ARE hidden for non-members.
User avatar
kikito
Inner party member
Posts: 3153
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:22 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: Poll: anti-SPAM techniques

Post by kikito »

bartbes wrote: Oh and I'm not sure about the links, but I found out yesterday user profiles ARE hidden for non-members.
Mmm I forgot to test that. But I was able to create a dummy account and logged in without seeing my email (with a non-existent email address).
When I write def I mean function.
User avatar
bartbes
Sex machine
Posts: 4946
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Poll: anti-SPAM techniques

Post by bartbes »

test-SPAM by any coincidence?
User avatar
kikito
Inner party member
Posts: 3153
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:22 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: Poll: anti-SPAM techniques

Post by kikito »

yup. Catchy, wasn't it?
When I write def I mean function.
User avatar
rude
Administrator
Posts: 1052
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:58 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Poll: anti-SPAM techniques

Post by rude »

Re-enabled GD CATPCHA.
User avatar
Taehl
Dreaming in associative arrays
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:07 am
Location: CA, USA
Contact:

Re: Poll: anti-SPAM techniques

Post by Taehl »

I would highly recommend reCAPTCHA. It's very effective, without being impossible for humans to read. After all, each of its captchas have already stumped an OCR algorithm. And the helping-digitizing-books thing is nice, too.
Earliest Love2D supporter who can't Love anymore. Let me disable pixel shaders if I don't use them, dammit!
Lenovo Thinkpad X60 Tablet, built like a tank. But not fancy enough for Love2D 0.10.0+.
User avatar
Jasoco
Inner party member
Posts: 3725
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:35 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Contact:

Re: Poll: anti-SPAM techniques

Post by Jasoco »

This is why I switched to the superior punBB. phpBB is old and busted. punBB is new hotness. ;)

But even then you are still gonna have people getting through.
User avatar
Robin
The Omniscient
Posts: 6506
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:29 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Poll: anti-SPAM techniques

Post by Robin »

Jasoco wrote:But even then you are still gonna have people getting through.
It doesn't have to be very often. Before the move, I don't think I remember even one spammer.
Help us help you: attach a .love.
User avatar
bartbes
Sex machine
Posts: 4946
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Poll: anti-SPAM techniques

Post by bartbes »

Well, yes, I do, but that was before the measure that rude just reactivated.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 55 guests