0.6.0 Update

General discussion about LÖVE, Lua, game development, puns, and unicorns.
Post Reply
User avatar
osgeld
Party member
Posts: 303
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:13 pm

Re: 0.6.0 Update

Post by osgeld »

Im old and gripey, is the new string constants (better idea, than what you had in 0.5) can we use ' || " or is is just limited to single quotes

Id hate to untrain my pinky finger :rofl:
User avatar
Robin
The Omniscient
Posts: 6506
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:29 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: 0.6.0 Update

Post by Robin »

osgeld wrote:Im old and gripey, is the new string constants (better idea, than what you had in 0.5) can we use ' || " or is is just limited to single quotes

Id hate to untrain my pinky finger :rofl:
Both are exactly the same--you could even use [[a]] or [=[a]=] etc.
Help us help you: attach a .love.
User avatar
Boder
Prole
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:47 pm

Re: 0.6.0 Update

Post by Boder »

I've been using the latest, just note

* using quads, the last two parameters are the width and height of the image
* I had to use require() and dofile() over love.filesystem.require() etc.
* TTF text positions at bottom left

my other notes, not sure if still relevant
*mkdir() fails when write directory not set
*ALWAYS use RELATIVE paths for love filesystem options, use ABSOLUTE paths for other libraries or lua
*need to add "/" between paths
User avatar
osgeld
Party member
Posts: 303
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:13 pm

Re: 0.6.0 Update

Post by osgeld »

mk I just tried the deb packages both X64 and X86 state
Error: Wrong architecture 'amd64'
Im running 32 bit ubuntu btw
Linux computer 2.6.28-15-generic #49-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 18 18:40:08 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
Attachments
Screenshot.png
Screenshot.png (41.24 KiB) Viewed 5130 times
User avatar
Robin
The Omniscient
Posts: 6506
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:29 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: 0.6.0 Update

Post by Robin »

osgeld wrote:mk I just tried the deb packages both X64 and X86 state
Error: Wrong architecture 'amd64'
Have you tried hand-editing the .deb? That might work, but I'm not sure.
Help us help you: attach a .love.
User avatar
bartbes
Sex machine
Posts: 4946
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: 0.6.0 Update

Post by bartbes »

I just fixed that in the repo, wait until the next build to see it in effect.
User avatar
Jasoco
Inner party member
Posts: 3725
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:35 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Contact:

Re: 0.6.0 Update

Post by Jasoco »

Does 0.6.0 still return OS X as "Linux" when getting the Platform?
User avatar
nevon
Commander of the Circuloids
Posts: 938
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:25 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: 0.6.0 Update

Post by nevon »

0.6.0 (more specifically e17b9a6456bd) just gives me a black screen when I try running any games. I get no error messages or nothing, just a black screen. 0.5.0 works just fine though.

I'm running Ubuntu 9.04. If you need more information, just ask.
User avatar
Robin
The Omniscient
Posts: 6506
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:29 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: 0.6.0 Update

Post by Robin »

nevon wrote:0.6.0 (more specifically e17b9a6456bd) just gives me a black screen when I try running any games. I get no error messages or nothing, just a black screen. 0.5.0 works just fine though.

I'm running Ubuntu 9.04. If you need more information, just ask.
Is the game written for 0.6.0 or for 0.5.0?
See http://love2d.org/wiki/index.php?title=Version_0.6.0 for a list of things that have to be changed to make it work.
Help us help you: attach a .love.
User avatar
nevon
Commander of the Circuloids
Posts: 938
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:25 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: 0.6.0 Update

Post by nevon »

Robin wrote:Is the game written for 0.6.0 or for 0.5.0?
See http://love2d.org/wiki/index.php?title=Version_0.6.0 for a list of things that have to be changed to make it work.
In my naïveté I thought 0.6.0 would be backwards compatible, but they kind people on IRC enlightened me. It now works as it should.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 33 guests