Just stumbled into this odd scenario. function love.keyreleased() for i = 1, 10 do if i == 10 then love.system.openURL("https://love2d.org/wiki/") return print("Whee!! ʘ‿ʘ") --print("Why am I being called??") end end end Run that as your entire main.lua project. Lua (or...

Thanks for the replies! ... in other words, you have to first make the mistakes to know that they are indeed mistakes. You said a lot of really good things, but for me this was the best part. I have to remind myself that making mistakes is part of the process, and even good (as a learning experience...

Experts, noobs, fellow novices, lend me your --ears-- eyes! I finally figured out why I keep getting stalled on game development: analysis-paralysis of code layout I come up with a great idea for a game, I start coding it, and all goes well. Until I'm a few systems/mechanisms/etc in, and I start run...

I'd recommend using string.match() like Brot did above, pull out the relevant items, and do whatever math is needed.

Hah, that was oddly fun. I really enjoyed discovering the secret in this game. Also, mega-quake.

togFox wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:58 am I didn't think of difficulty levels. I'm not sure what that might be. Stronger gravity? Less fuel efficiency? Less fuel bases? I'll think about that.

What about more difficult terrain? Sharper peaks, maybe flying through occasional caves/tunnels (ie. there's a roof), etc?

randomnovice wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:04 pm Looks really fun! I hit a bug (see image).
-snip-

I had that happen once too. I'm on Linux, so I didn't report the issue. But it's referencing a debug section that I think was removed with the latest build. Not sure what causes that or how to pin it down.

I like watching this develop so far. I like the idea of things resolving simultaneously and NOT being real-time. Allows for planning and really smooths out the (unfair?) advantages a superior computer/network would otherwise grant. Looking forward to watching this progress!

Yeah, makes sense then. Coords 0,0,[INT] seems to always give 0.5 as an output, which your map generator must interpret as a ground tile. Here's a quick example: for i = 1, 5000 do print(love.math.noise(0,0,i)) -- always gives 0.5 end Changing the 0 to 0.5 results in "better" noise values,...

borr wrote: ↑Tue Feb 08, 2022 6:25 pm but something went wrong

That's an extremely vague description of the problem you're having. Also, support questions tend to get better support in the support forum.