Thanks dood. Yeah, we intentionally made it difficult and getting the boomerang stuck is an intended part of the gameplay - we thought it would help support the You Only Get One theme. The level designs are particularly cruel! There are 10 floors in all but the last is an open area. You'll need to h...

You created the 'player' table inside of a function that you intended to be an element of said table. It might be a good idea to have the table created beforehand and implicitly passing a reference of the table using self. player = {} function player.someFunction(self, someArg) self.x = someArg self...

Having studied UI, semiotics and graphic design I feel that the current layout is fit for purpose. Not only does it function well but does so with elegant form, and I feel that your proposed changes encroach on this design. The pure black text contrasts far too much against the background and impact...

From the entry page: "Quest for the Golden Boomerang which lies atop a tower where you must battle its current owner." The stairs to the next floor will be revealed when all the switches have been lit by hitting them with the boomerang. Pretty much finished, entire game can be completed. T...

Unless you plan on supporting legacy Löve builds you needn't bother with the x86 OS X implementations. There are very few modern macs that run on a 32-bit architecture.

Not an answer to your question, but still good to know: If your table is not a list (i.e. does not have numeric indices), you can savely remove (but not add) items while iterating with pairs(): for k,v in pairs(tbl) do if should_remove(v,k) then tbl[k] = nil end end Could you explain this? I unders...

In your main.lua at line 37 you adjust the players y velocity without using dt. I tweaked it and applied dt which prevented the floating bug, but the collision seemed a bit off. There could be more places in your code like this, but I don't have time to check right now.

Sweet. My favourite new feature has to be the inclusion of enet. Math module is great too, I don't think anyone liked the standard PRNG. Good job guys.

If you're using 0.9.0 be aware that the configuration file is now called 'love.conf' rather than 'conf.lua'. No. The function is (and was) called love.conf, it's still in conf.lua. Wut? Where did I read otherwise...?! Hrm, thanks for correcting me on that. In any case, I am suspicious that MysticPi...

If you're using 0.9.0 be aware that the configuration file is now called 'love.conf' rather than 'conf.lua'.

I was le wrong.