Mine: Yes, I'm running on a notebook.

Anyway, given the fact that it runs fast on 0.9.2 but slow on 0.10.1 makes this a regression issue, don't you think?

Anyway, here's a nice post on how to deal with the issue as a game developer:
http://gamedev.stackexchange.com/a/109002

TL;DR:
- offer a key mapping option in your game
- as a default, try to stick to common combinations like WASD

The 32bit version is just as bad.

I tried 0.9.2 and there my program starts instantly. Both versions were 64bit btw. Shutting off my virus scanner doesn't seem to affect anything but it was worth the try. I wonder if it's just me. It's not a deal breaker but it's definitely slowing me down in my development. The fact that 0.10.1 is ...

I think you're right. Strange that I've never come across this issue before. For any other readers, at the top of the article posted by Slime there is an applet which indicates any "keyboard ghosting". Or you can try the following script: main.lua I guess because this is a hardware issue, ...

I noticed that for some combination of keys simultaneously getting pressed down, some of them are not getting registered by Love, that is, they don't return true for love.keyboard.isDown. This is especially troublesome for triple key combinations, not uncommon in games. Examples: down + right + rctr...

Hi, I'm running love 0.10.1 in Windows 7 using the simple command line instruction: love . inside the directory containing a main.lua file The issue is that no matter what Love program I try to run, be it a self written game or a simple hello world, it takes easily 30 seconds before the program rend...