Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tutorial:Bounding Box Collision Detection"
m (marking comment by User:Luiji) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
1. The self-promotion thing was by accident. | 1. The self-promotion thing was by accident. | ||
2. I am not biased towards [[love.physics]], I meant that if you want complicated stuff like circular collision, this was not the way to go. | 2. I am not biased towards [[love.physics]], I meant that if you want complicated stuff like circular collision, this was not the way to go. | ||
| − | 3. I only had five minutes to write this, so I did not have much time to do any explaining. | + | 3. I only had five minutes to write this, so I did not have much time to do any explaining. <sup>previous unsigned comment by [[User:Luiji|Luiji]]</sup> |
Revision as of 02:18, 25 June 2010
Opinion about love.physics
The writer seems very biased towards using love.physics, is this permitted? Bartbes 21:49, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
This isn't really a tutorial is it? This should be replaced with a more robust explanation and collision detection solution. TechnoCat
1. The self-promotion thing was by accident. 2. I am not biased towards love.physics, I meant that if you want complicated stuff like circular collision, this was not the way to go. 3. I only had five minutes to write this, so I did not have much time to do any explaining. previous unsigned comment by Luiji
