ivan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 10, 2023 8:54 pm
@glitchapp You are missing the big point, namely that we want to support the legit, open source projects. That is why it is important to avoid code which is suspicious in origin.
I'm not missing the point, I understand perfectly what you mean, I simply disagree with the claim that a generic small code which generates something completely simple like a noise could and should be copyrighted. We are not talking about an O.S. No offenses but It sounds utterly ridiculous to me.
I also support legit open source code, but real big code with meaning and not little things like that that anyone could write in less than a minute and which alone and without a real program using it means nothing.
By the way, I stated at the top of the file that it was written by chatGPT so that people can see for what kind of small problems can chatGPT be useful and also so that the human written code and non human written code are clearly differentiated, but I don't think you could ever find out if a human has written a small fragment of code like this or not.
Till now, what chatGPT is capable of doing is very limited and it only solve small specific problems, problems that are simple enough you can solve by yourself if you spend the time for it, but nothing really complex without a human glueing the fragments of code to produce something really meaningful. This is probably going to change in a near future given the speed of evolution of this new techologies, but that time in which an A.I. can write an O.S. has not arrived yet.