LÖVE

schmirsich wrote:Your website and subsequently the documentation seems to be offline. I presume you are still continuing the project?

The documentation is on github now: https://github.com/KennyShields/LoveFrames/wiki

schmirsich wrote:Your website and subsequently the documentation seems to be offline. I presume you are still continuing the project?

Hope this to be fixed soon doc is really important~

I came here because the site is down. I see you moved the documentation, but I can't find the demo. I wanted to download it to use it to work on a skin. Is there a place to download it / can I get a download please?

Hi there.

I did nothing so far but what the documentation says, and löveframes throws me this internal error. Any idea what's wrong?

Oh, the demo throws the same error. Can someone recommend a different GUI library?

murks wrote:Oh, the demo throws the same error. Can someone recommend a different GUI library?

Code: Select all

$ love .
Error: libraries/loveframes/init.lua:317: bad argument #1 to 'insert' (table expected, got nil)
stack traceback:
	[C]: in function 'insert'
	libraries/loveframes/init.lua:317: in function 'Create'
	libraries/demo.lua:35: in function 'CreateToolbar'
	libraries/demo.lua:24: in function 'Load'
	libraries/demo.lua:149: in main chunk
	[C]: in function 'require'
	main.lua:5: in function 'load'
	[string "boot.lua"]:418: in function <[string "boot.lua"]:413>
	[C]: in function 'xpcall'

It might be possible that the version of loveframes that you're using is outdated? I just downloaded the demo and loveframes and ran them together on windows with love 0.9.2 without a hitch. If there is an issue with the latest, it probably has to do with improper capitalization of filenames somewhere in the source.

Löve Frames worked for me at some point, about half a year ago.
It was not outdated, I pulled it from git. I was using Lua 5.2.4, löve 0.9.2 on Linux x86_64.
I do agree that it might have something to do with file names, because I have seen weird things in some libraries, like not accepting '/' in paths, but only '.'. I can't remember which library it was, it was all during a game jam. Is it still accurate that windows ignores capitalisation in some cases?

murks wrote:Löve Frames worked for me at some point, about half a year ago.
It was not outdated, I pulled it from git. I was using Lua 5.2.4, löve 0.9.2 on Linux x86_64.
I do agree that it might have something to do with file names, because I have seen weird things in some libraries, like not accepting '/' in paths, but only '.'. I can't remember which library it was, it was all during a game jam. Is it still accurate that windows ignores capitalisation in some cases?

Windows is case-insensitive with filesystems in general. '.' is the only correct way of requiring modules, as it is the only platform-agnostic way of doing so in Lua5.1.

S0lll0s wrote:Windows is case-insensitive with filesystems in general.

Not quite true. Windows is case insensitive unless you compile it into an executable/love, in which case, it will error any inconsistencies.

davisdude wrote:

S0lll0s wrote:Windows is case-insensitive with filesystems in general.

Not quite true. Windows is case insensitive unless you compile it into an executable/love, in which case, it will error any inconsistencies.

FAT and NTFS etc are case-insensitive. It's just that the ZIP format is case-sensitive, which has nothing to do with Windows, except for the fact that you have to think about case-sensitivity even on Windows.