ranking

[Nixola]

cookie clicker clones?

No, that would be on IRC.
Not on #love, not even on OFTC

[jjmafiae]

you just want the cookie clicker clones for yourself, xD

[YoungNeer]

what i encountered:

start title: prole ( 0 posts )
second title: citizen (80 posts)
third title: party member (100)
--not sure about last one
fourth title: inner party member (1000)

a hidden sub-forum.

I don't think that is true - cause I have seen inner party members under 1000 posts and many citizens under 50 posts. I guess rude is behind all this or maybe the other team members. Or maybe it's something else that counts maybe the rate at which you post.

[zorg]

Can you stop bumping ancient threads with zero reason or additions to the topics? Chances are, no one is going to care.

[YoungNeer]

Can you stop bumping ancient threads with zero reason or additions to the topics? Chances are, no one is going to care.

Well I'm sorry it was no-where written that this thread was an "ancient thread" neither did any-one inform me that I couldn't reply to "ancient threads". And I'm pretty sure this is not the first time we are meeting, right z.org

[zorg]

No worries, people make mistakes, the dates are indeed very small.

gregorian_date_system.png (16.56 KiB) Viewed 3409 times

Also, you can reply, it's just usually pointless unless one's contributing something worthwhile, hence why some are against it, even if it's technically not a rule; it does bump off more recent topics that people are interested in, from the first page of any subforum.

[YoungNeer]

Also, you can reply, it's just usually pointless unless one's contributing something worthwhile, hence why some are against it, even if it's technically not a rule; it does bump off more recent topics that people are interested in, from the first page of any subforum.

Well that is some logical reason which I didn't expect from you! If you'd always be so logical then I guess we will never have any clashes (you can bet on it)

And you said "people make mistakes" but I don't think you quite agree with that yourselves. Otherwise you woudn't have taken 'negative stance' against me.